Felo API PlatformFelo API Platform
返回案例列表
CASE / matija-sosicen2026-09-18
MEDIA / 1video
MMatija Sosic@MatijaSosic
影片生成JEV

Here's a 45-second TL;DR on Jev.

Here's a 45-second TL;DR on Jev. I find the core idea beautifully simple, but the video made it really hard to understand. Hope you find it helpful. https://t.co/KtSKlEMVL3
1,409,303瀏覽
8,747讚
7,616收藏
632轉發

原創與引用

@GoSailGlobal

关于 Jev 的 45 秒视频 核心理念其实非常简单优美 不止于game、trade 在速度、文本理解、排序的基础上可以衍生出很多:https://t.co/HpbXiO33fb https://t.co/CRLpFPi4NC

@zhodonx

This Lab is changing everything we know about how AI is being built into software. I got a chance to look into TypeFace’s new model, Jev, and I genuinely think these guys are onto something interesting. For context: TypeSafe is a San Francisco AI lab co-founded by Diogo Almeida, one of the researchers behind the work that helped make ChatGPT possible. They’ve just emerged from two years in stealth with $40 million in seed funding and their first public model. And the interesting part about this model is you can’t even chat with it. You can’t ask it to write an essay or generate code either. Jev is built to make decisions inside software, and the way it does this is pretty interesting. Here’s all you need to know: TypeSafe calls Jev a new class of AI models, System One Models. Imagine you’re building a customer support app. Someone complains about an order, threatens to cancel, and asks for a refund. You want your app to figure out how urgent the complaint is, which department should handle it, and whether a human needs to intervene. With Jev, you provide the message, define those questions, and specify the possible answers. It evaluates them and returns structured decisions with probabilities your software can immediately act on. And here’s how it differs from conventional LLMs: ⟢ It doesn’t generate text: You define the possible answers beforehand using three primitives: Choice, Score, and Noul (yes/no). ⟢ Its structured outputs are native: Instead of gene

@NorthstarBrain

1 useful AI thing today: Jev because ChatGPT's co-inventor just shipped an AI that refuses to write a single word Jev, it just decides You don't talk to it, you hand it a message, a ticket, or a document and ask a question. It sends back a decision your software can use immediately: this queue, this score, this yes/no. 6 things you should know: 1. The person behind it already helped invent the chatbot era. Diogo Almeida worked on the methods behind InstructGPT and ChatGPT, then spent 2 years asking a different question: if models are already great at talking, why isn't software fully automated? His answer was TypeSafe and a new model class they call System One. Jev is the first public one. 2. It only answers 3 kinds of questions. Choice: which team should get this ticket? Score: how urgent is this, from 0 to 2? Yes/no: does this customer want a refund? You can ask several at once. It answers them in parallel. 3. The speed and price are INCREDIBLE. Typical replies: 70 to 500 milliseconds. Input: about $0.042 per million tokens. Output: free. That is why people are putting it in places ChatGPT struggled One Minecraft bot ran 2 minutes for about a cent. A browser agent found flights in 7 seconds for $0.0039. One developer ran about 5,000 requests for roughly two dollars. 4. The useful part is the confidence score. High confidence: automate. Low confidence: send it to a human or a smart model. That is how you get cheap automation imo 5. The early use cases are "boring

@tadle_com

A video reflecting the core idea about the JEV model. It might not be obvious right off the bat, but all the decision-making procedures have been packed into Tadle's later-revealed reasoning. https://t.co/RrM12k8uoW

引用帖

DDiogo Almeida@CompleteSkeptic

After co-inventing ChatGPT, I kept asking myself: why have superhuman chat models not led to AGI? I’ve spent the last 2 years in stealth building a new way to train models (RLCD), and a new type of frontier AI model that we are releasing today: Jev • 20-200x faster • 40-400x https://t.co/JSybNG2BKJ

查看原帖